Political Splintering

Political splintering is defined by a political faction breaking away from its parent group. It occurs when two classes of a political party have difference ideological beliefs. 

The Whigs are just one example of political splintering. During this time, their main controversial issues was slavery. The

Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, however, was put in effect to allow single territories to decide for themselves if they wanted to be slave free or not. The northern and southern Whigs could not come a complete agreement on slavery, so a split had to happen. The differences between the north and south is now responsible for the creation of the Republican party. 

The Dixiecrats are also an excellent examples of political splintering. Differences between

the northern and southern Democrats began to reveal themselves because of the civil rights issue. Their differences caused the two political parties to be completely flipped. The southern Democrats because known as what the Republicans used to be, and the Republicans switched with the Democrats. However, the issue was not completely solved. Through this, the Dixiecrats, also known as the States Rights' Democratic party, was formed. This new party did not stay for long as clearer lines were drawn places moderates and liberals as Democrats, and the Republicans as conservatives.

Supreme Court Tells Industry Group Attacking The $15 Minimum Wage To Go Away

May 3, 2016
Unit 4-The Judiciary 

A Supreme Court case presented arguments against Seattle’s $15 an hour minimum wage mandate that ranged from challenging to basically an assault on lawmakers’ power over businesses. One of the arguments suggested that the minimum wage infringes the First Amendment because it causes companies to spend money on wages that have the possibility to be spent on advertising instead. This became an appellate court case. The Supreme Court later decided that it will not hear the appellate jurisdiction from a federal circuit court of appeals settlement of refusing to halt Seattle’s minimum wage. Since the Supreme Court is usually rather eager to take cases where there is a conflict among federal appeals courts, the fact that they didn't might imply that the justices might be hesitant to take up an issue where the Court’s membership isn't stable.

I think that the Supreme Court should take this more into consideration. Courts should have jurisdiction over this case and should look into how this might be a violation of the Constitution. As a person my age, where the minimum wage applies to the majority of the few jobs I am able to attain, it is a topic of importance to me.

Source: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2016/05/03/3774434/supreme-court-tells-industry-group-attacking-the-15-minimum-wage-to-go-away/